to teach of not to teach the book

the arguments usually revolve around the issues of racism. some people think that kids are too young to learn about racism and how it really was back in the day, and others think its a perfect opportunity for kids to see racism in a different way and through the perspective of a young child. i take the side of the where the learning part of the argument. i think its better to learn about what's going on because it still happens even now. if we educate the kids now we might be able to stop all of the prejudging that every one takes on.

banned in the USA

the patterns for the banned books were banned because of how sexual it was or because it deals with homosexuality and or sex ED! come on! we learn this stuff in school why cant they have it in a book?  and homosexuality.... in most neighborhoods you will find a gay couple. there really is no big deal about it any more, so it shouldn't matter if its in a book or not. 

the lowest of animals

if there were to be a chance that i could change some part of the human nature, i really don't know which one i would actually choice to change. but possibly one for a starter i would start with the enjoyment of revenge. to get ride of it. thats why most wars start, why most fights at school all ways end up with a few kids with bloody noses and maybe broken bones. they do it out of anger. you can be angery but tis what you do with it that makes people scared of the emotion.

    revenge will always hurt others.

satire

satire is like sarcasm its funny in an opposite sort of way. the web site is making fun of recent news by adding exaggerations. they make it funny. to a point you don't really know if there telling the actual truth!